Fillean meal ar an meallaire.
Evil returns to the evil doer.
(Fortunately, this story does
not involve Irish Wolfhounds. The Irish Wolfhound Society of Ireland
does not restrict itself to just Irish Wolfhound breed information,
health and welfare issues. After the championship shows are over and
done with, dogs of all breeds are our responsibility.
What follows is a sickening and disgusting story. The full
indictment may be read
here
,
but you are warned that it is nauseating
reading.)
We can only hope that Michael Vick and his accomplices go to prison for a very long time. )
![]()
The Michael Vick Dog-Cruelty Case Isn't the Same Old Thing
By Ann Woolner

July 19 (Bloomberg) -- So often does an athlete
get into trouble with the law that it is a cliche to say the sports
pages read like crime blotters.
And yet, the indictment this week of football superstar Michael Vick
for allegedly conspiring to run an interstate dog- fighting
operation kicks suspected criminal conduct by pro athletes into a
whole new category.
We have grown accustomed to the gunplay, the drug use, the assaults
on women, the assaults on men, the really bad driving. Not to
mention generally boorish behavior.
The 18-page indictment returned this week against Vick and three
other men describes something quite different: a long- running
criminal conspiracy carefully planned, scrupulously hidden,
potentially lucrative and cold-heartedly cruel.
Vick, the Atlanta Falcons quarterback, as it turns out also owns the
aptly named Bad Newz Kennels in rural Virginia.
There, dogs were beaten, hung, electrocuted, starved and forced to
fight other abused dogs while their owners and others bet thousands
of dollars on which dog would die or give up in agony first, the
indictment says.
The poor creatures who lost matches, or whose torturous training
never built them into vicious enough fighters, were summarily
killed, federal grand jurors allege. And they aren't talking about
putting down a family hound to halt the ravages of disease or old
age.
They are talking about, for example, wetting down a dog and then
applying an electrical charge. Or slamming the dog to the ground. Or
shooting, hanging or drowning the pooch.
Accused in Killings
Vick carried out some of the killings, which continued into this
April, and was consulted in at least one other, the indictment says.
The Falcons' immediate reaction to the indictment doesn't quite
capture the horror of the crimes alleged.
``We are disappointed that one of our players -- and therefore the
Falcons -- is being presented to the public in a negative way, and
we apologize to our fans and the community for that,'' the team's
statement said.
Presented to the public in a negative way? The club seems to be
apologizing for a bit of bad publicity.
While confessing ``we are disturbed'' by the indictment, the
Falcons' statement says the club will soldier on through this
adversity ``as the legal process plays out.'' With a new season
coming up, ``Our plan is to continue to do everything we can to
support our players and coaches.''
Well, I, for one, am relieved that the players and coaches will be
supported. Whatever that means.
False Accusations
It is true, of course, indictment does not proof of guilt make. The
Duke University non-rape case teaches that, as have other instances
where false accusations led to mass hysteria, ruined reputations and
caused job loss.
So let us remember that Vick has repeatedly declared himself
innocent. He says he had no idea what was happening on his property,
living as he does in Atlanta.
The only crime he will admit was helping relatives by giving them a
place to live in Virginia. It was them, not he, who did whatever was
done to those poor creatures while Vick was away and unaware, he
says.
``It's unfortunate I have to take the heat behind it,'' he told the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution in April after a raid at the house
turned up dozens of animals, some scarred and hungry, as well as
dog-fighting paraphernalia.
``It's a call for me to really tighten down on who I'm trying to
take care of,'' Vick said. ``When it all boils down, people will try
to take advantage of you and leave you out to dry.''
Poor, victimized Vick.
All the Blame
It is hard to imagine his co-defendants will take kindly to getting
all the blame, especially if prosecutors come around offering a
bargain for turning against Vick.
Already the indictment cites information from four unnamed
individuals who are acting as confidential witnesses. One of them
says Vick personally paid him $11,000 after Bad Newz's dog lost to
his in 2003.
Another witness says he got $23,000 in cash from Vick for two of his
dogs' victories over Bad Newz dogs.
And yet another who is cooperating with the feds describes a fight
involving one of his dogs where he was chastised for shouting out
Vick's name in front of the crowd. Vick was at the fight, the
indictment says.
It is only an indictment, I know.
But not even Vick disputes that he owns the property where, the feds
say, 54 dogs were found, where equipment for training dogs was
seized, where bloody carpeting and buried carcasses paint a clear
picture. You would think the National Football League would seize
the opportunity to separate itself from the whole horrific thing.
Cruel and Degrading
The league, at least, has acknowledged that ``the activities alleged
are cruel, degrading and illegal.''
And while the NFL, like the team, says it will let the legal process
take its course, it also pledges cooperation and to apply its
personal-conduct policy to the matter.
It doesn't take a criminal conviction to get disciplined under the
policy. It is enough for a player to exhibit ``conduct that
undermines or puts at risk the integrity and reputation of the
NFL.''
The league's new commissioner, Roger Goodell, has pledged a
get-tough policy for errant players. Vick has given him a chance to
show he means what he says, no matter how valuable the player, no
matter how unusual the conduct.
(Ann Woolner is a Bloomberg news columnist. The opinions expressed
are her own.)
Source: www.bloomberg.com